Tuesday, January 19, 2021

Book List: Books Read in 2020


I keep track of the books I read on LibraryThing. Every January, I post a list of the books I read the prior year. It's usually a few over 100. There have been a couple of years when I didn't get to 100, when work was crazy. There haven't been many years when I got over 110. 

Here's the list of the 109 books I read in 2020, in the order I read them. 2020 was such an insane year, it could have gone either way, reading-wise. I know some people read twice as many books as usual, some people read hardly any. I read the same.

Notes about my rating system are below the list.

BOOKS READ IN 2020

  • Circe by Madeline Miller ðŸŒ¹ðŸŒ¹ðŸŒ¹ðŸŒ¹ðŸŒ¹
  • Cheri by Colette ðŸŒ¹ðŸŒ¹ðŸŒ¹
  • Americanah by Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie ðŸŒ¹ðŸŒ¹ðŸŒ¹ðŸŒ¹ðŸŒ¹
  • Gigi by Colette ðŸŒ¹ðŸŒ¹ðŸŒ¹
  • Warlight by Michaele Ondaatje ðŸŒ¹ðŸŒ¹ðŸŒ¹ðŸŒ¹ðŸŒ¹
  • Calypso by Davis Sedaris ðŸŒ¹ðŸŒ¹ðŸŒ¹ðŸŒ¹
  • The Overstory by Richard Powers (Pulitzer Prize) ðŸŒ¹ðŸŒ¹
  • The Tiger's Wife by Téa Obreht (Women's Prize) 🌹🌹🌹🌹
  • Patrimony by Philip Roth ðŸŒ¹ðŸŒ¹ðŸŒ¹ðŸŒ¹
  • Hidden Falls by Kevin Meyers ðŸŒ¹ðŸŒ¹ðŸŒ¹ðŸŒ¹
  • Orphan Train by Christina Baker Kline ðŸŒ¹ðŸŒ¹ðŸŒ¹1/2
  • The Friend by Sigrid Nunez (National Book Award) ðŸŒ¹ðŸŒ¹ðŸŒ¹1/2
  • Queen Sugar by Natalie Baszile ðŸŒ¹ðŸŒ¹ðŸŒ¹ðŸŒ¹
  • The Likeness by Tana French ðŸŒ¹ðŸŒ¹ðŸŒ¹ðŸŒ¹
  • The Guest List by Lucy Foley ðŸŒ¹ðŸŒ¹ðŸŒ¹ðŸŒ¹ðŸŒ¹
  • The Sympathizer by Viet Thanh Nguyen (Pulitzer Prize) ðŸŒ¹ðŸŒ¹ðŸŒ¹
  • Country Girl by Edna O'Brien ðŸŒ¹ðŸŒ¹ðŸŒ¹ðŸŒ¹
  • Vinegar Girl by Anne Tyler ðŸŒ¹ðŸŒ¹ðŸŒ¹ðŸŒ¹
  • House of Trelawney by Hannah Rothschild (Wodehouse Award) ðŸŒ¹ðŸŒ¹ðŸŒ¹ðŸŒ¹ðŸŒ¹
  • Robinson Crusoe by Daniel Defoe (Classics Club) ðŸŒ¹ðŸŒ¹ðŸŒ¹ðŸŒ¹ðŸŒ¹
  • The Nickel Boys by Coleson Whitehead (Pulitzer Prize) ðŸŒ¹ðŸŒ¹ðŸŒ¹ðŸŒ¹ðŸŒ¹
  • Mr. Mercedes by Stephen King (Edgar Award) ðŸŒ¹ðŸŒ¹ðŸŒ¹ðŸŒ¹ðŸŒ¹
  • The Stranger by Albert Camus (Classics Club) ðŸŒ¹ðŸŒ¹1/2
  • Cranford by Elizabeth Gaskell ðŸŒ¹ðŸŒ¹ðŸŒ¹1/2


MY RATING SYSTEM

My rating system is my own and evolving. Whatever five stars might mean on amazon, goodreads, or Netflix, a five-star rating probably doesn't mean that here. In fact, I'm going to change this year and use roses for my rating system, since this is Rose City Reader. My system is a mix of how a book appeals to me and how I would recommend it to other people. 

🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹 Five roses for books I loved, or would recommend to anyone, or I think are worthy of classic "must read" status." Examples would be Lucky Jim (personal favorite), A Gentleman in Moscow (universal recommendation), and Great Expectations (must read). 

🌹🌹🌹🌹 Four roses for books I really enjoyed and/or would recommend to people who enjoy that type of book. Examples would be The Jewel in the Crown and In the Woods. Most mysteries get four roses from me because I like them a lot but would only recommend them to people who like mysteries. (A few really great mysteries get five roses from me.) Similarly, some of my favorite authors get four roses from me because I wouldn't recommend them to a general audience, like funny books by P.G. Wodehouse or food memoirs by M.F.K. Fisher. 

🌹🌹🌹 Three roses for books I was lukewarm on or maybe liked personally but wouldn't think of recommending. Examples would be Sexing the Cherry (lukewarm) and The Year of the French (liked personally but wouldn't inflict recommend).

🌹🌹 Two roses if I didn't like it. The Neapolitan Quartet is an example, which proves how subjective my system is because lots of people loved those books. 

🌹 One rose if I really didn't like it. I don't know if I've ever rated a book this low. The Magus might be my only example and I read it before I started keeping my lists. 

I use half roses if a book falls between categories. I can't explain what that half rose might mean, it's just a feeling.

Here is a link to the star rating system I used for years. I include it because the stars I used in years past meant something different than these roses, so if you look at my lists from past years, the ratings won't mean quite the same thing.


No comments:

Post a Comment